Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky

Posted by: Teslinhiker

Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/22/11 05:29 PM

Good news article of a person recounting his many mistakes and subsequent rescue from Mt. Ripinsky in Alaska. Interesting to note the 3rd last paragraph in the article, his mistakes will be affecting him for the rest of his life.

One day away from a two-week holiday in San Diego, Keith Hutchins was braced against a sheer face on Mount Ripinsky, playing mind games with himself to stay awake and alive.

Beneath him was an avalanche chute and a vertical drop he doubted he could survive. To either side of him were rock walls. Above him was the section of steep mountainside he’d fallen down.

"I was afraid to sleep. If I loosened up the tension, I was going down the cliff," Hutchins said.
Posted by: hikermor

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/22/11 05:51 PM

Great story. It is so easy to get disoriented in low visibility...
Posted by: dweste

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/22/11 05:58 PM

“Experience is the name every one gives to their mistakes.”

Oscar Wilde quotes (Irish Poet, Novelist, Dramatist and Critic, 1854-1900)
Posted by: bsmith

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/22/11 08:15 PM

Originally Posted By: Teslinhiker
Good news article of a person recounting his many mistakes and subsequent rescue from Mt. Ripinsky in Alaska.

a great example of making many small - at the time - ill-advised or ill-thought-out decisions that combine to place one in great jeopardy.

a great lesson.

thanks for sharing this.
Posted by: Susan

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/23/11 02:59 AM

Another prospective Darwin Award winner. I hope he isn't breeding.

YoooooHoooooo! Keith Hutchins! No one is missing on Mt. Hood yet, and it's already January 22...

Talk about 'truly unprepared'!

Sue
Posted by: Ann

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/23/11 04:33 AM

This statement of his really stood out to me:

Quote:
"Like a knucklehead, I got complacent. I’ve been up there a million times. I didn’t think it would take much time."


It sounds like a variation of "short hike syndrome". Even though 7 miles (according to the link) isn't short by most people's standards, apparently he considered it so and his considerable experience with this specific trail also lulled him into complacency.

It's refreshing to see a hiker own up to his mistakes; it sounds like he's learned his lesson, albeit the hard way.
Posted by: Hikin_Jim

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/24/11 04:05 AM

"Doctors told him he would never snowboard again and that he may not be able to return to his job as a carpenter."

Ouch.

Always bring a map and compass -- and check those GPS batteries before you get in the car.

HJ
Posted by: MostlyHarmless

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/24/11 07:49 PM

Some remarks I made to myself when reading:

Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins
He told himself to turn around, then ignored his own advice.


That seems to be a classic: Whenever you're about to do something you really shouldn't, there is usually a part of you telling you to stop.

"Get-there-itis", "summit fewer" are just two names given to man's phenomenal capacity to ignore the advice of a person he deeply respects and trusts: Himself.

Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins
"At seven o’clock I said to myself, ‘I’ve made it from two to seven and I haven’t fallen off or frozen to death. I can make it another five hours…’ Five hours later, he told himself, "I’ve made it 10 hours. I can make it another nine hours until it gets light."


That's the spirit: Break the impossible into small, manageable chunks. Do one chunk at a time. Don't worry about the next 100 chunks - just focus on the chunk at hand.

Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins

Hutchins also focused on his 17-year-old daughter he was planning to visit in California. "I thought of her the whole time, and I thought, ‘I’m going to see her again. I am not going out like this.’ She was a lot of my inspiration."


According to Laurence Gonzales (Deep survival), someone to live for seems to be an important, perhaps crucial factor in most or all of those who survive against impossible odds. (But since we can't interview those who didn't survive such odds we can't say for sure if the same applies to non-survivors...)


Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins

As soon as I got to the top, I turned around. Things didn’t look right. For some reason it was easier to see where I was going up than it was going down."


IMO, that is always the case. There is only one way UP. Down you have the full 360 degree set of directions to choose from.

Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins

With only five feet of visibility, Hutchins headed downward, aiming for a pond that lies between the peak’s north and south summits. When he dropped steeply for a long time, he realized he wasn’t in line with the pond and assumed he’d instead gone down the mountain’s east side, toward Lutak Inlet.

He turned 90 degrees, thinking he’d intersect the trail.


A compass would have been incredible useful in that situation.... Not that I recommend 5-foot visibility in steep terrain to anyone. But at least a compass can stop you from heading right down any of the 100% lethal cardinal directions. Heading in the not-so-lethal direction is a great place to start (though it does not stop you from falling down the 60-foot cliff that you were supposed to sidestep by 15 feet before heading in that direction).


Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins

Ten minutes later, Hutchins had climbed to a treacherous spot, with no way up or down. He was out of cell phone range and realized he was nowhere near where he’d thought he was.

Climbing over a rock outcropping, trying to get within phone range, he fell backwards, he thinks maybe 500 feet or more.


Sometimes, you dig yourself deeper into trouble by every action you make... But then again, staying put on that mountain wasn't a really viable option. Or was it? We don't know what equipment he carried.

Originally Posted By: Keith Hutchins

Also, the sky cleared at times, giving him a view of stars and the Big Dipper. "It was actually pretty beautiful."

"At some point you accept the fact that this is really happening to you, and you deal with it."


More of the stuff you find in Gonzales: Deep survival. Appreciation of beauty and accepting the situation in earnest are perhaps to facets of the same mind set necessary for survival?


Bear in mind that I don't know what he carried of equipment, the local terrain or what conditions he was exposed to. I am snug, warm and comfortable where I sit, enjoying my coffee. Therefore it is very easy for me to say things as having a bivy bag and a sweater would have removed none of his joy at the snowboard, but vastly expanded his options.


IMO, a PSK for the winter mountains is at the very minimum a small backpack with bivy bag, a sweater and something to drink (preferably warm). That's about 6 pounds, give or take. Perhaps also a small collapsible shovel, depending on when and where. Of course, you should also add a snack as well as the more conventional "survival-in-a-tin-can" items, they weigh next to nothing anyway. But the most crucial thing in the winter mountains is shelter from the environment and hydration.


Of course, it is hard to argue that a PLB would have removed any need to get off the mountain the fastest and most lethal way possible. All he had to do, was push the button and don't freeze to death while waiting for either a ground crew or favorable helicopter conditions.


As a side note: I am curios to what comments he would have received if he a) had a PLB, and b) pushed the button when he should have realized he was in deep trouble, BEFORE falling off a cliff or being part of an avalanche. Would he be scorned as the guy who pushed the button at the first hint of trouble?
Posted by: Glock-A-Roo

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/24/11 09:17 PM

Originally Posted By: Susan
Another prospective Darwin Award winner. I hope he isn't breeding.


Wow, a pretty harsh assessment there.

The low visibility situation like this one is where the GPS really shines. Taking key waypoints along the route allows you to navigate back down in zero visibility. There's no need to run the unit continuously to record a track or follow it back. If you are proficient at plotting UTM coordinates on your map then targeting those spots in the GPS allows you to navigate efficiently on new terrain, again in zero visibility. In this way you could safely take a different route down.

All the standard caveats apply (terrain association & map/compass first, know how to use it, don't rely 100% on batteries, etc etc).
Posted by: Hikin_Jim

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/24/11 09:40 PM

Originally Posted By: Glock-A-Roo
The low visibility situation like this one is where the GPS really shines.
Yeah, you've got that right. A map and compass and knowledge of the techniques to use them are great, but in a white out or other low visibility situation, a GPS stands out. I've been hiking, backpacking, cross country skiing, snowshoeing, etc. for years and years and have developed pretty good proficiency with a map and compass. I've never needed a GPS and have eschewed them thus far (expensive, one more freakin' thing to carry, have to learn how to use them), but someday in some situation I'm sure I'll wish that I had one.

I do however carry a PLB. I'm not a complete Luddite. smile

HJ
Posted by: Glock-A-Roo

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/24/11 10:07 PM

Originally Posted By: Hikin_Jim
I've never needed a GPS and have eschewed them thus far (expensive, one more freakin' thing to carry, have to learn how to use them), but someday in some situation I'm sure I'll wish that I had one.


$85 shipped from Amazon. IMO it's all that's needed. The mapping and color screen on higher models are superfluous for someone like you who understands landnav. The etrex H gives you the high sensitivity receiver for fast, accurate coordinates and the ability to follow tracks, routes and waypoints. Simple and effective. Use lithium cells.
Posted by: Hikin_Jim

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 12:25 AM

"Hmmm," said Jim.

HJ
Posted by: hikermor

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 01:04 AM

Or consider one of the "Foretrex" models from Garmin. Gives your location, and with your map that is all you need. I have used one for years..
Posted by: Glock-A-Roo

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 03:41 AM

Originally Posted By: hikermor
Or consider one of the "Foretrex" models from Garmin. Gives your location, and with your map that is all you need. I have used one for years..


Good point, I had forgotten that the Foretrex models now have the high sensitivity receiver too. Very, very light and compact. If I didn't already have an etrex I would probably go with the Foretrex.

I hope Hikin' Jim appreciates our efforts to get him to spend his money... cool
Posted by: Hikin_Jim

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 05:53 AM

lol
Well, of course I do but not nearly as much as my wife.

HJ
Posted by: MostlyHarmless

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 07:13 AM

Originally Posted By: Glock-A-Roo

The low visibility situation like this one is where the GPS really shines. Taking key waypoints along the route allows you to navigate back down in zero visibility. There's no need to run the unit continuously to record a track or follow it back. If you are proficient at plotting UTM coordinates on your map then targeting those spots in the GPS allows you to navigate efficiently on new terrain, again in zero visibility. In this way you could safely take a different route down.


Well - yes and no, but in steep terrain it isn't exactly a walk in the park. Sometimes, one might choose to take calculated risks to get home, including applying your best navigation skills to find your way down in less than optimum conditions. Staying put on the mountain is risky, too. My rant below is to give a more realistic assessment of the risks and limitations involved.


This technique (which is EXACTLY how I use my GPS together with topo maps) has three limitations that needs to be taken seriously:

1: The accuracy of you reading the UTM grid off the map. At the best of circumstances, using a ruler and a flat table, warm and snug indoors you can perhaps do with an accuracy of +- 0.5 mm if you are really careful. Out in the field, being stressed and slightly freaked out, I would say an accuracy of +- 2mm is probably realistic - that is IF YOU ARE USING A RULER. Most base plate compasses has a ruler. For the maps I use most, being 2 mm off equates to being 100 meter (300 feet) away from where you think you are.

If you're not using a ruler, I would say an accuracy of somewhere +- around a quarter of an inch.


2: The accuracy of the map and how detailed it is. Can you really trust your map to have included all 30-feet vertical / not-really-true-vertical-but-the-fall-will-still-kill-ya drops? No, you can't - and absolutely not in steep (close-to-vertical) terrain.


3: The accuracy of the GPS. Being 3 meters (10 foot) away from your tracks going can and will kill ya on certain places.

Of course, if you're using the GPS tracks to guide you back then you're within the accuracy of 3).


The last limitation of the GPS is that for most models you have to move a certain distance (at least 10 meters / 30 feet) to have a reliable direction indicator. Also, the direction indicator can be a bit confusing when you start wandering back and forth, trying to find the exactly right direction. A compass is the right tool if you want to start moving in the right direction at your FIRST try.


Many places, the accuracy really isn't that critical - you might very well be several hundred meters away from where yo think you are - as long as you follow the GPS guidance or at least wander somewhere not-too-far away from the correct direction you will be OK. Steep mountains aren't one of those places.


In total white-out conditions and with fresh, powdery snow covering everything, you will NEVER see a vertical drop before tumbling down. Everything around you is slightly greyish white. No features. No shadows. No landmarks or boundaries. It doesn't matter if visibility is 500 feet or 5 feet - anything covered with fresh snow will blend in with the other powdery snow, and that includes the lip of snow that overhangs the cliff. What stands out is those things not totally covered with snow, such as rocks or bushes. The only exception is if it is blowing, then the older, harder snow MIGHT stand out in those places exposed to the wind.
Posted by: hikermor

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 10:41 AM

Originally Posted By: MostlyHarmless

In total white-out conditions and with fresh, powdery snow covering everything, you will NEVER see a vertical drop before tumbling down. Everything around you is slightly greyish white. No features. No shadows. No landmarks or boundaries. It doesn't matter if visibility is 500 feet or 5 feet - anything covered with fresh snow will blend in with the other powdery snow, and that includes the lip of snow that overhangs the cliff. What stands out is those things not totally covered with snow, such as rocks or bushes. The only exception is if it is blowing, then the older, harder snow MIGHT stand out in those places exposed to the wind.


If you and I are traveling together in these cheery conditions, it is high time that we rope up and move very cautiously.

I have often speculated as to how useful a GPS would be in backtracking across a crevassed glacier, even with wands (markers) in place. This is a situation where even a three foot deviation can be lethal. We would need good equipment and all our skills to get down in good order, and we would need to employ them while we were still oriented. Realistically, that doesn't always happen..
Posted by: Hikin_Jim

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/25/11 09:27 PM

Originally Posted By: MostlyHarmless
In total white-out conditions and with fresh, powdery snow covering everything, you will NEVER see a vertical drop before tumbling down. Everything around you is slightly greyish white. No features. No shadows. No landmarks or boundaries. It doesn't matter if visibility is 500 feet or 5 feet - anything covered with fresh snow will blend in with the other powdery snow, and that includes the lip of snow that overhangs the cliff. What stands out is those things not totally covered with snow, such as rocks or bushes. The only exception is if it is blowing, then the older, harder snow MIGHT stand out in those places exposed to the wind.
An old trick is an empty Nalgene on a length of cord. Toss it ahead of you and watch where it goes. Another trick is to throw snow balls ahead of oneself although something brightly colored is going to work a lot better.

HJ
Posted by: MostlyHarmless

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/26/11 07:27 AM

Originally Posted By: Hikin_Jim

Originally Posted By: MostlyHarmless
In total white-out conditions ...


An old trick is an empty Nalgene on a length of cord. Toss it ahead of you and watch where it goes. Another trick is to throw snow balls ahead of oneself although something brightly colored is going to work a lot better


Thanks a lot, that is a trick I will remember.


Not that I am in the habbit of charging into steep terrain in zero visibility conditions... but whiteout is very common in snow covered, three-less mountains. All it takes is low lying clouds and the light will be dispersed so evenly between the snow and the clouds that everything snow covered will be obscured and there is no shadow, no 3D information. Spooky.


Luckily, the very tiny bit of whiteout / close-to-zero visibility navigation I've tried have been along routes I've known like the back of my hand AND where I have confidence there are no lethal terrain surprises .... Still spooky.
Posted by: JerryFountain

Re: Rescued hiker recounts ordeal on Mt. Ripinsky - 01/26/11 02:57 PM

I have never used a Nalgene, but my avalanche cords are all in small (brightly colored) bags -- one to find them in my pack and two so that I can put something in the bag, tie the cord to it and use it as described. Unfortunately I have had to do it too many times. A few (very few) in steep terrain. Spooky is the best word I can think of (thanks MostlyHarmless). Of course, you don't have to worry about immediate hypothermia - the sweat is comming fast. :0

Respectfully,

Jerry