Well I have owned the full-size and the mini and I "think" I'm going with the full-size RSK. I missed my full-sized RSK so much (you may remember I dropped it in the lake recently) that I ordered another one! <img src="/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> It's on backorder until the end of the month. I can't see having both RSKs so I "may" sell my Mini on Ebay or something since it's still in mint condition. I'm not a rich man so I have to find some way to subsidise the purchase of the replacement full-size RSK before the wife finds out that I'm on my third $100 knife in little over a month. The Mini is really the perfect size for EDC as it is very very comfortable in my pocket, however with the laws in my area allowing carry of knives with up to 5" blades, I feel I am short-changing myself by carrying a blade under 3". <img src="/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" /> I don't feel I need a 5" EDC knife but I do feel there is a big difference between the 2.88" and 3.44" blade lengths. Not to mention that with the full-size RSK I can have the same knife for both urban and rural EDC if I want. I really like the idea of one trusty knife for true 24/7/365 EDC and I thin the full-size RSK fits the bill best, since I do spend a lot of time both in the city and out in the wilderness. I have tried both knives now and decided that I am probably going sacrifice a little comfort in the pocket in order to have a little extra blade length on my EDC knife. I know you guys love talking about knives and many of you own both RSKs (or similar sized knives) also, so opinions are quite welcome.